June 2019 Volume IV Issue IV
Teachers as Leaders
When I began teaching, site-based management was in vogue. Teachers, usually those who wanted to be administrators, were provided with all sorts of managerial and administrative tasks. Then, we called this teacher leadership. Reminding myself that when we know better, we do better, I know that wasn’t true teacher leadership, although the intentions were noble. True teacher leadership connects teachers and principals in their shared mission: improving learning for students. We know that the most important factor in a child’s education is the teacher; when we invite and include expert teachers in improving the learning environment throughout the school, we aren’t removing our best teachers from the classrooms to become administrators. Instead, we are extending their reach. In this issue of Professional Practices for the 21st Century Leader, I explore the idea of shared leadership embedded in Professional Standards for Education Leaders (PSEL) Standard 7: Professional Community for Teachers and Staff. I discovered that schools are more complex and less complicated according to Johnston, Coughlin, and Berger’s Leading in Complexity and share some critical ideas for our work in teacher leadership. I offer conditions that promote teacher leadership, ways to find and elevate teacher leaders, and a tool to help assess our school’s capacity for teacher leadership.
Why Teacher Leadership?
Marcia Baldanza, the author of Professional Practices and a Just ASK Senior Consultant, lives in Arlington, Virginia. Until recently she worked for the School District of Palm Beach County, Florida, where she was an Area Director for School Reform and Accountability; prior to that she was Director of Federal and State Programs.
In The Many Faces of Leadership, Charlotte Danielson argues a persuasive case for the necessity of teacher leaders. She makes the following four points that have not changed, but can and must.
- Teaching is a flat profession.
The 20-year veteran’s responsibility is essentially the same as it is for newly licensed teachers. In many settings, the only way for a teacher to extend his/her influence is to become an administrator, and for many, this work is not interesting.
- Many teachers’ tenure in schools is longer than that of administrators. In many cases, administrators stay in their positions for 3-5 years, whereas teachers stay far longer. Often, teachers hold the institutional memory and are considered the custodians of the culture.
- The demands of the modern principalship are practically impossible to meet. Principals today are expected to be visionaries, competent managers, and instructional leaders. Additionally, the principal is the point person for all things accountability. Finally, wise principals lean on others to further school improvement goals.
- Principals have limited expertise. Like all educators, principals have their own areas of instructional expertise. The principal cannot be expert in everything.
Considering these factors, school improvement depends on the active involvement of teacher leaders and deliberate support from principals. School administrators simply cannot do it all.
What Do Teachers Bring to Leadership?
I often write about and teach the importance of relationships in schools. Understand that relationships already exist in schools among and between teachers, students, parents, administrators, specialists, counselors, and support staff. The question to ask is, How do (or don’t) these relationships influence the adults in the building to do good things for students? Leadership is a type of relationship that mobilizes other people to improve their practice. Teachers have an extraordinary opportunity to exercise leadership because, as Linda Darling-Hammond writes, they are the most powerful influence, next to students, on other teachers’ practice. Where principals can shape teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors, other teachers do shape them.
Princpals need teacher leaders of all kinds. Great schools grow when educators understand that the power of their leadership is in the strength of their relationships. Gordon Donaldson writes that while school administrators play an important and vital role in improving relationships and outcomes for students, teachers are uniquely positioned to contribute and have developed special assets that enhance the school leadership mix.
Leading Complexity in Complex Times
I find great value in studying leadership from a variety of sources. Great leadership is great leadership, whether it is as a CEO of a Fortune 500 company, manager of the local coffee shop, conductor for a youth orchestra, or school principal. I read an article titled “Leading in Complexity: What makes complex different and how can leaders respond effectively?” that helped me distinguish between complicated problems and complex ones. The aut hors, Johnston, Coughlin, and Berger, believe organizations are generally quite good at solving complicated problems. They either develop the needed skills in themselves and their employees or hire those who can meet the need. These organizations are good at breaking the complicated problem into manageable chunks and take them one at a time. They identify best practices, decide what things will likely lead to success outcomes, and then focus on those. They are data driven and fact based. Sound familiar? Sound like the school improvement planning process and plan? This approach can be useful and helpful, except when it isn’t.
The authors point out that all problems are not created equal. They argue that it is important for leaders to know the nature of the problem, but also how to adjust their approach accordingly. It turns out that most people like certainty more than they like uncertainty, which is why we treat all problems as if they can be solved (making them complicated). Snowden and Boone suggest that leaders resist the temptation to narrow or solve to soon; experimentation and monitoring are more helpful as is diversity of perspective. Here’s where teacher leaders can help. I believe our major problems in schools are of a complex type. Snowden defines these as the domain of unknown unknowns. Specifically, leading change or shaping a culture are the problems he is describing. This is where the honest perspective of the classroom can help the principal. While there are several strategies that are more effective than others in school improvement and may be described as complicated, the real long-term, sustainable and dynamic work is complex and requires a different approach. The authors describe the leaders as having an agile and ready stance. This is a different way of thinking and leading. There is no one right answer and the behaviors of openness, curiosity, and uncertainty prove beneficial. Ponder this concept for a while and then access the article at: www.cultivatingleadership.co.nz/site/uploads/Leading-in-complexity.pdf. It’s full of usable information that might just make a difference as you plan with the new school year in mind.
Conditions That Promote Teacher Leadership
Why do some schools have many teacher leaders and others have few? Are there conditions that can promote or hinder teacher leadership? Let’s explore this.
I read a guest blog in Peter DeWitt’s EdWeek Finding Common Ground blog that stuck with me. Below are my take-aways from what literacy coaches Lisa Billings and Amy Giska wrote. Nobody knows (or should know) more about the students in our schools than the teachers in the classrooms. Teacher leaders hold an enormous amount of knowledge that the principal doesn’t readily have. Teacher leaders bring different perspectives, creative solutions, and inspiration to a school’s vision. The authors encourage us to unlock the teacher leadership that is hiding in each of our buildings.
We can no longer treat education as a private practice. Teacher leaders have expertise and are compelled to share with others. Teachers everywhere should be committed to the growth of their students, certainly, and equally committed to the growth of each other. It is no longer acceptable for teachers to learn something and become expert at it (for example project-based learning, readers’ workshop, hand on geometry, technology use, etc.) and be limited to the four walls of the classroom. When teachers and teaching remain private the school’s instructional capacity remains static or diminishes. Neither scenario is acceptable.
Susan Moore Johnson, and Morgaen Donaldson describe the “triple threat” of autonomy, egalitarianism, and seniority that I have observed. I’m sure you have too. They suggest that colleagues resist the teacher leaders’ work because they see it as an inappropriate intrusion into their instructional space, an unwarranted claim that the teacher leader is more expert than they are, and an unjustified promotion of a novice to a leadership role. Further the authors offer five specific behaviors that principals should incorporate to support their teacher leaders.
Elevating Teacher Leadership
In 2016, Learning Forward published A Systematic Approach to Elevating Teacher Leadership available at https://learningforward.org/docs/default-source/pdf/a-systemic-approach-to-elevating-teacher-leadership.pdf. This comprehensive guide to to teacher leadership offers both components the make up a system of teacher leadership and defined assumptions about teacher leadership. I took the four components and ten assumptions and turned them into a self-assessment that can be used to define high quality leadership and as a goal-setting instrument. See the tool I created below.
This tool is available on our website at https://justaskpublications.com/areas-of-focus/instructional-leadership/resources/
Share this newsletter
Permission is granted for reprinting and distribution of this newsletter for non-commercial use only.
Please include the following citation on all copies:
Baldanza, Marcia. “Teachers as Leaders” Professional Practices, June 2019. Reproduced with permission of Just ASK Publications & Professional Development. © 2019 All rights reserved.